THE MT VOID
Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
01/10/14 -- Vol. 32, No. 28, Whole Number 1788
Co-Editor: Mark Leeper, mleeper@optonline.net
Co-Editor: Evelyn Leeper, eleeper@optonline.net
All material is copyrighted by author unless otherwise noted.
All comments sent will be assumed authorized for inclusion
unless otherwise noted.
To subscribe, send mail to mtvoid-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send mail to mtvoid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
The latest issue is at http://www.leepers.us/mtvoid/latest.htm.
An index with links to the issues of the MT VOID since 1986 is at
http://leepers.us/mtvoid/back_issues.htm.
Topics:
Film Trivia Answer (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Ray Harryhausen Effects from ANIMAL WORLD (comments
by Mark R. Leeper)
Joys of PACIFIC RIM (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
My Top Ten Films of 2013 (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)
A Recap of 2013 in Science (comments by Dale L. Skran, Jr.)
BANSHEE CHAPTER (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
DARK ANGEL (Season One) (television review
by Dale L. Skran, Jr.)
E=mc^2 by David Bodanis (book review by Greg Frederick)
LONE SURVIVOR (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
This Week's Reading (THE EERIE SILENCE, THE NEW AMBIDEXTROUS
UNIVERSE, and WHERE IS EVERYBODY? FIFTY SOLUTIONS TO
THE FERMI PARADOX AND THE PROBLEM OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL
LIFE) (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
==================================================================
TOPIC: Film Trivia Answer (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Last week I asked "Wolf-human combinations appear in what two 1930s
Universal horror films?"
The only response I got was from Andre Kuzniarek who said that one
example is THE WEREWOLF OF LONDON. He also gave DRACULA. In the
dialog somebody does say that Dracula turned into a wolf. I could
disqualify saying that a mention is not an "appearance" and that
Dracula is not at all human any more. But I will count it.
Particularly since I was working up to a play on words. The other
answer I was going for is SON OF FRANKENSTEIN. The Wolf-human
combination is Wolf Frankenstein. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Ray Harryhausen Effects from ANIMAL WORLD (comments by Mark
R. Leeper)
Perhaps Ray Harryhausen's least known post-1950 film was THE ANIMAL
WORLD (1956). The film was a documentary about prehistoric life on
earth produced, written, and directed by Irwin Allen, who was not a
scientist. As a result the film was a compendium of goofs, errors,
and scientific inaccuracies. Allen's scientific accuracy was bad
even for 1956, which is probably why the film was so little seen
after its first release.
As time has passed it has only become more inaccurate. Almost all
interest in the film today is in the dinosaur sequences animated by
Ray Harryhausen and Willis O'Brien. (Irwin Allen would later
betray O'Brien by hiring him as an effects technician for the 1960
THE LOST WORLD, but then using live lizards rather than O'Brien's
stop-motion effects.)
I had wondered if Harryhausen's work would ever become available
again. I should have more faith in the power of YouTube. The
dinosaur sequence is available. The aspect ratio appears to be
wrong, but the whole sequence is there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRowJEyzvw4
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: Joys of PACIFIC RIM (comments by Mark R. Leeper)
I have never understood why in movies with giant monsters, the
scale of size is bi-modal. You have people the size of ... well
... people. Then you have the giant monsters. And they are all
about the same size. Most monsters that walk upright are just
about the same height of Godzilla, who was about 150 feet tall.
King Kong was only about 25 feet tall, but when he met Godzilla,
they were about the same height. [-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: My Top Ten Films of 2013 (film comments by Mark R. Leeper)
Once again a year that seemed lackluster has rallied in the final
month or so, though perhaps not so much as in previous years. Last
year there was a better top range with films like LINCOLN, THE
IMPOSSIBLE, ARGO, and LES MISERABLES. It is harder for me to be
enthusiastic about the films in the top-rated range. This was just
not a strong year for narrative films. On the other hand,
documentaries seem very much to be coming to be a major part of
film attraction. But here are the films I was most impressed with
this year. I should note that this has been a tremendous year for
one actor. Matthew McConaughey escaped the type-casting of the
handsome lover in romantic comedies. I saw three films in which he
had really good character roles. Besides the two below, DALLAS
BUYERS CLUB and MUD) was perhaps his oddest role in THE WOLF OF
WALL STREET. He is an actor to watch for. I would say the same
about Mads Mikkelsen, (A ROYAL AFFAIR and THE HUNT), but he is now
very easy to find. He is the title psychopath in the NBC TV series
HANNIBAL. I have not seen it and I doubt he has good looks the way
McConaughey does, but he is still an interesting actor. For me
that is very important.
At the expense of dramatic impact, I will list them in the order of
best to ... well ... good but not up to the best. And after the
top ten I will include two honorable mention films.
1. 12 YEARS A SLAVE
This is the truly horrifying true story of Solomon Northup, a free-
born black man who in 1841 was kidnapped and sold into slavery. 12
YEARS A SLAVE is based on his eyewitness account of his years of
slavery, what he saw, and what he experienced. As one character
puts it, "the story is amazing and in no good way." It is a
powerful and important film, an unflinching look at some of (what
we would hope is) the worst cruelty of human slavery in the
Antebellum South. Rating: +3 (-4 to +4) or 9/10
2. THE HUNT
In a small town in Denmark a popular kindergarten teacher is
accused of sexual misconduct with first one and later with many
children. Lucas (played by Mads Mikkelsen) struggles against a
gossip-fed witch-hunt of hatred and prejudice that threatens to
destroy his life. Thomas Vinterberg directs and co-authors a film
that makes a very interesting companion piece to his THE
CELEBRATION (1998). Rating: +3 (-4 to +4) or 9/10
3. 56 UP
Every seven years since he made 7 PLUS SEVEN in 1970, Michael Apted
visits (essentially) the same set of people and he documents how
their lives have changed since the last film in the series. They
were all 7 years old in 1964, and they are all the same age as each
other now. In this mammoth undertaking we reacquaint ourselves
with the fourteen (now 13) people and get a status report of their
development and see how their attitudes early in life may have
shaped them. This year they are all 56 years old. The films lie
somewhere in the gulf between valuable scientific study and several
parallel soap operas. Rating: +3 (-4 to +4) or 9/10
4. THE ACT OF KILLING
An oddly surreal documentary made by a film crew largely working
anonymously. The camera focuses on a major executioner from the
1965 killings following the military coup in Indonesia. To get him
and some of his friends to be truthful the company films them re-
enacting their murders in the style of American gangster films and
lavish musicals, claiming to film them for a movie. The killers
apparently have never given much thought to regretting their
actions. Joshua Oppenheimer, Crystine Cynn, and a third person
unnamed directed this film. Rating: low +3 (-4 to +4) or 8/10
5. A HIJACKING
This Danish film covers some of the same territory as CAPTAIN
PHILLIPS, but in most ways this is the superior film. A cargo ship
is captured by Somali pirates. But the emphasis of the film is not
on the conflict between the crew and the pirates. An executive of
the shipping company Peter Ludvigsen (played by Soren Malling)
chooses to negotiate for the company himself in spite of the advice
of a hired advisor. That condemns him to the stress of a months-
long negotiation. The emphasis is much more on the bartering and
bargaining with the pirates. We see the story of each side. This
is not an action film. Violence is kept off-screen and primarily
is inflicted on a goat. (Well, the Somalis had to bring more food
on board and their most portable food source is goats.) Unlike the
Hanks film CAPTAIN PHILIPS the bargaining process drags on for long
months. While various people have misunderstandings of each other,
we are privy to motives that are not clear to the characters
involved. And because film makes the process understandable for
the viewer the film reminds one of the excellent MARGIN CALL
(2011). Most of A HIJACKING is in Danish, but all negotiations are
held in English, which helps a lot. Rating: low +3 (-4 to +4) or
8/10
6. DALLAS BUYERS CLUB
Matthew McConaughey dropped a lot of weight as well as his romantic
image to play Ron Woodroof. Woodroof was big into cocaine and sex
and (in the film) rodeo until in 1985 he was diagnosed with AIDS.
He was given one month to live. The FDA-approved treatment was
worse than useless so Ron set up an international network to buy in
mass anti-viral drugs unapproved by the FDA. With McConaughey's
role in MUD followed by this role McConaughey clearly transforms
himself from heartthrob to serious actor. Jean-Marc Vallee directs
a screenplay by Craig Borten and Melisa Wallack. Rating: low +3
(-4 to +4) or 8/10
7. NEBRASKA
Alexander Payne gives us a sad, low-key comedy/drama filmed in
black and white. David already knew his father Woody (Bruce Dern)
was moving into old-age dementia, but now Woody has gotten a
publisher's ad claiming he has won a million dollars and he is
convinced he can claim the money if he can present the ad in
Lincoln, Nebraska. David agrees to have one last adventure with
his father, taking Woody from Billings, Montana, to Lincoln,
Nebraska, on a fool's errand that he knows can only end in
disappointment. Rating: low +3 (-4 to +4) or 8/10
8. ALL IS LOST
Robert Redford is traveling a long distance alone in a sailboat
when mid-Indian-Ocean he hits a shipping bin fallen from a
container ship. He knows enough sea craft to avoid drowning for
eight days, but it is a battle that he loses hour by hour. Fewer
than five sentences are spoken. The rest is just watching Redford
doing whatever it takes and finding sometime ingenious solutions to
problems nearly impossible problems cropping up. Rating: low +3
(-4 to +4) or 8/10
9. EUROPA REPORT
This science fiction indie does just about everything right. It is
an account of a privately funded space mission to Jupiter's moon
Europa. From the beginning we know that Europa One never returned
to Earth and the film after the fact tells the story of what
happened. The visuals are just about right and the dialog is very
believable. Sebastian Cordero directs a screenplay by Philip
Gelatt. The film makes a good companion piece to the recent
GRAVITY and some scenes are quite similar. Rating: low +3 (-4 to
+4) or 8/10
10. MUD
Jeff Nichols writes and directs a deliberate, well-textured film
set in Arkansas river country. Two boys get involved helping a
fugitive hiding out on a Mississippi River island and trying to
collect his girl friend. Arkansas-born Nichols knows the rhythms
of the South and the feel of the country and the people. The
languorous setting might capture the viewer by itself if not for
the strong performances set into it. Matthew McConaughey's gristly
performance stands above the atmosphere. Rating: low +3 (-4 to +4)
or 8/10
Honorable Mention
THE WOLF OF WALL STREET
Sex, drugs, the most beautiful women money can buy, expensive cars,
and yachts make up the world of stock scammer Jordan Belfort.
There are echoes of GOODFELLAS in Martin Scorsese's portrait of
Belfort based on Belfort's own memoir. At three hours in length
the film shows enough sex and drug parties that they become
repetitive and for some will be unwelcome. But the film almost
seems to admire the man called "the world's greatest salesman" and
other titles less charitable. The film sports more humor than any
Scorsese film since AFTER HOURS. The most serious problem is that
the nature of Belfort's crimes afford very little visual depiction.
We have to take the story's word that what Belfort did was very,
very bad and forget that it looks like fun. Scorsese shows us no
victim of Belfort's crimes but Belfort himself and he gets little
more than a slap on the wrist from the law. Rating: low +3 (-4 to
+4) or 8/10
STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS
As a piece of intelligent science fiction J. J. Abrams's new STAR
TREK film is only middling, but as an action film it is really
quite good. It has some arresting images, some very engaging
character development, and perhaps two or three too many explosive
action scenes. A saboteur apparently within the Starfleet Command
is bent on destroying it. Captain Kirk, dishonored for his
handling of a previous space mission, nonetheless has the
Enterprise restored to him to sneak into Klingon territory and
capture the culprit. Don't like the plotline? Wait ten minutes
and the story will have transformed into something else. This film
has a complex plot that manages to balance character writing with
slam-bang action sequences and great acting by the intriguing
Benedict Cumberbatch. Oh, and as a "Star Trek" series film INTO
DARKNESS ranks among the very best. Rating: low +3 (-4 to +4) or
8/10
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: A Recap of 2013 in Science (comments by Dale L. Skran, Jr.)
Among the various science magazines I peruse regularly are DISCOVER
and SCIENCE. DISCOVER is a popular magazine that aims at an
audience somewhere between SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN and POPULAR SCIENCE,
while SCIENCE is one of the leading professional journals in the
world, on a par with NATURE and CELL. Many of the most important
scientific papers appear first in SCIENCE, which is the flagship
publication of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science (AAAS).
DISCOVER ends the year with "100 top stories of 2013"
(January/February 2104), which I find an excellent opportunity to
catch up on major events in science and technology that I may have
missed. It is also a great chance to consider the achievements of
the year in perspective. SCIENCE also has a year-end article
titled "Breakthrough of the Year" (December 20, 2013) which names a
breakthrough of the year, and also discusses runners up, creating a
similar annual perspective on progress.
So, without further ado, let's take a look at what stood out in the
DISCOVER article. SF fans will be delighted to see that Curiosity
on Mars is the #1 story of the year, reminding us of traditional SF
set on the red planet. However, story #5 recalls BRAVE NEW WORLD
as it reviews stem cell progress in 2013, including the first human
stem cells made from eggs (a major step toward human cloning),
using stem cells to create a functioning mouse liver (great news
for those needing liver transplants!), and, perhaps most
fantastically, using stem cells to create mini-brains. Story #7
focuses on the often neglected field of pure mathematics, as Zhang
and Helfgott report significant progress toward solving the twin
prime conjecture and the equally famous Goldbach conjecture, which
played a role in Frederick Pohl's story, THE GOLD AT STARBOW'S END.
Story #13 ventures deep into SF territory as scientists used both
implanted electrodes in rats and EEG caps in humans to provide an
operational brain-to-brain connection, allowing simple commands
like "fire" to be transmitted. A major asteroid strike in Russia
near Chelyabinsk resulted in story #16, and hopefully advanced the
cause of protecting the Earth from future collisions by raising the
profile of this vital issue. For some reason, the advent of CRISPR
technology, which makes gene editing precise and fast for the first
time, only made it as story #20, but it is easy to imagine that
over time it will prove to be the most important scientific event
of 2013. Of course, that honor might easily also go to #21, the
successful search for and discovery of a large number of ExoPlanets
in other solar systems by the Kepler space telescope.
The real proof we are living in the 21st century comes with story
#25, the demonstration of the quantum teleportation of information
over a distance of 6 mm. This may not sound like much, but it
portends computers that are no longer limited by the speed of light
in the transfer of data. Another SF story, LIGHT OF OTHER DAYS by
Bob Shaw, becomes partially real in story #30, wherein scientists
halt a beam of light for an entire minute! More good news comes in
story #42, in which a new compound appears to be effective against
both Ebola and Rabies, which is excellent news indeed!
A common trope of SF is growing meat in vats, see (e.g.) Isaac
Asimov's THE CAVES OF STEEL. Story #58 describes the result of
eating hamburgers made in vats, but based on taste, it appears that
it will be quite a while before this SF idea escapes from the
laboratory. Another SF idea that will take a long time to become
useful is found in story #61--a technique for creating a "tractor
beam" that can pull tiny Styrofoam particles toward a light source.
Alas, scaling this technology up to Star Trek size lies in, at
best, the distant future.
Another proof that we live in the 21st century comes from story
#69, which chronicles the reporter's attempts to use Google Glass.
The writer is less than impressed, but something like this will
surely soon impact our lives. What science story of the year
roundup would be complete without the latest "new element"--in this
case Ununpentium, element 115--in story #74? Story #96--on Elon
Musk's proposed hyperloop transportation system--seems like a
vintage SF tale in itself. The future of this proposal for rapid
transportation is uncertain, but it has burnished Musk's already
vast reputation. Musk, who is CEO of Tesla Motors and SpaceX, has
been named "2013 Businessperson of the Year" by FORTUNE magazine.
No real person comes closer (yet) to being Heinlein's THE MAN WHO
SOLD THE MOON.
SCIENCE named cancer immunotheraphy the "Breakthrough of the Year"
while, oddly, DISCOVER didn't make it one of the top 100 stories!!!
Suffice it to say, this breakthrough may be the one we've been
waiting for, as two different techniques fundamentally different
from surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation are showing real success
against end-stage cancers. The conclusion of this tale remains to
be written, but SCIENCE decided, I think correctly, that it was
time to declare that we have entered a new age, one in which we
can, for the first time, start to imagine victory in the war on
cancer.
SCIENCE lists CRISPR gene editing, the cloning of human cells, and
the creation of the mini-brains as runners up for 2013. These
stories were all mentioned by DISCOVER as well, but SCIENCE also
declares the mole rat to be the "Vertebrate of the Year" since two
studies in 2013 hinted at why the mole rat can live up to thirty
years cancer free. Again, these papers hint that we may, for the
first time, be really getting a handle on how to fight cancer.
SF fans will surely be fascinated, however, by the SCIENCE
"Invertebrate of the Year," Issus coleoptratus, a hopping insect
that turns out to have gears (yes, you read that right--GEARS!) on
it's rear legs allowing them to make mighty leaps. SF fans will
also be pleased to note that in another runner-up, the Fermi Gamma-
Ray Telescope has proved that Cosmic Rays come from the wreckage of
supernovas.
That sums up an exciting year in science, and without even
mentioning a host of amazing technological feats, such as the
successful completion of the Grasshopper reusable rocket program by
SpaceX and the first powered flights of Virgin Galactic's Space
Ship Two. So, I'll close by wishing you all a Happy New Year in
2014, and all scientists and engineers even more success in their
endeavors than they met in 2013! [-dls]
==================================================================
TOPIC: BANSHEE CHAPTER (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: A writer investigates the disappearance of a friend and
gets caught up in the CIA Project MKUltra and perhaps some
supernatural links to other universes. Combining the authentic
horrors of illegal CIA medical tests on unwitting victims and more
Lovecraftian inter-dimensional horrors, BANSHEE CHAPTER delivers
some cheap but occasionally effective scares to keep the audience
jumping. This is a bleak and low-budget horror. But too much of
the story is drag-drag-drag-BANG all taking place with eye-
straining dark photography. Rating: +1 (-4 to +4) or 6/10
One of the fastest routes into the filmmaking business is via the
horror film. One reason is that that route is economical. It need
not be expensive to make a film scary. Some of the most effective
horror films like WHITE ZOMBIE and CARNIVAL OF SOULS were made on
low budgets. It is even less expensive if you go the more recent
found-footage route. BANSHEE CHAPTER a premier film for its
writer/director Blair Erickson. For much of the scares it depends
on intervals of nothing much happening punctuated with sudden loud
noises. That approach is not as impressive as creating a deep and
fearful mood, but it does work on at least some level. It will get
an audience to jump.
The film starts out with actual news coverage about the all too
real Project MKUltra. In the 1950s and '60s the CIA ran behavioral
tests on unwitting Americans to test psychedelic drugs that they
thought might have uses in brainwashing and in interrogation. The
film suggests that the drug used was dimethyltryptamine--also real.
The fiction kicks in when young James Hirsch (played by Michael
McMillian) is years later trying to learn more about Project
MKUltra and goes so far as to actually try dimethyltryptamine-19
(DMT-19) on himself. James was never heard from again.
James' friend Anne Roland (Katia Winter) decides to investigate
what happened to James. Somehow mixed up in all of this is a
"numbers" radio station that seems to have something to do with the
users of DMT-19. Numbers radio stations are real also, by the way.
Whoever runs them is unknown, and they broadcast seemingly
meaningless random numbers. They are suspected of containing coded
messages. The more Anne investigates the more she realizes she
does not know and the more sinister things get. Involved with
James' fate is a possibly-psychotic drug-guru, Thomas Blackburn
(Ted Levine), who may or may not be the force behind James'
disappearance.
To a great extent the story is told with grainy found footage,
particularly those scenes showing the sadistic experimentation of
MKUltra. The plotting is in large part just thinly disguised
souped up haunted house storytelling. There are lots of dark
corridors where most of the image is just this side of total
darkness. This is definitely an eyestrain movie. Long dark
sequences lure the viewer to almost fall asleep and then something
loud and horrific happens. The images are grungy and unpleasant.
In spite of using actual artifacts of the CIA in the Cold War, the
film is really a loose adaptation of H. P. Lovecraft's story "From
Beyond" and there is a bit of "Whisperer in the Darkness" thrown
in, if I am not mistaken. The reader can decide which is scarier,
the CIA or Lovecraftian creatures from other dimensions.
One of the producers is Zachary Quinto, Mr. Spock in the new series
of "Star Trek" films. It also has producers in common with MARGIN
CALL and ALL IS LOST.
This is an ambitious horror film, but too much of the time the
viewer is just waiting for something horrific to happen. In the
end the film does little that is new and novel. I rate BANSHEE
CHAPTER a 1 on the -4 to +4 scale or 6/10. BANSHEE CHAPTER will be
released to theaters January 10, 2014.
Film Credits: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2011276/combined
What others are saying:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_banshee_chapter/
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: DARK ANGEL (Season One) (television review by Dale L. Skran,
Jr.)
BLADE RUNNER is often remembered as the film that best evoked the
feeling of classic cyberpunk novels like NEUROMANCER. When it
comes to television, however, the series that most captured the
bleak Gibsonian vision is probably DARK ANGEL, a show that ran only
two seasons, starting October 3, 2000. Although best remembered as
the program that introduced Jessica Alba to the masses as a global
class hottie, DARK ANGEL appears in retrospect to have been doomed
by the changing times. In October 2000 it was perfectly fine to
have a TV series where the villains were evil US military officers
and government officials, and the background of the story a massive
terrorist EMP attack that put the USA into a deep depression.
On September 12, 2001, in the aftermath of a real terrorist attack
that killed over 3,000 Americans and plunged the world into a new
kind of global conflict, the USA needed the military to be heroes
again, and a new generation of dark angels to fight the devils that
attacked America. This period also marked the ascendancy of
Herbert W. Bush's Leon Kass led Bioethics Commission, which spent
most of the decade railing against human enhancement. Against this
background, genetically enhanced Max Guevara (Alba) did not stand a
chance.
Looking back from the lofty perspective of 2013 year end, DARK
ANGEL survives on DVD as a surprisingly well thought out SF series
with a high idea density, a dark but generally realistic tone, and
some predications about drones that came about more or less as
described. In the DARK ANGEL back story, in the late 1990s the US
Government starts project MANTICORE to create genetically enhanced
soldiers. There are a number of generations, and the X-2 group has
to be "put down" except for a few examples kept for study purposes.
The X-5 group, of which Max is a part, appears to have been the
first really successful group. Perhaps the X-5s were a bit too
successful, since in 2009 Max and eleven other nine-year-old super-
soldiers escaped from MANTICORE. Their escape is facilitated by a
terrorist attack using an EMP weapon on June 1, 2009, that throws
the US into chaos and greatly hampers MANTICORE's efforts to find
the missing X-5s.
We never hear much of the X-1s (presumably a failed generation as
well), the X-3s, the X-4s, or the X-6s. The X-7s show up in the
final episode of the first season and are pitted against the X-5s.
The X-7s appear to be clones of the X-5s modified to have a hive
mind. It is mentioned that some of the super-soldiers are deployed
in the field, so it is possible that many of the unmentioned groups
were successful to some degree, and were thus deployed somewhere.
The X-5s are chimeras resulting from the mixing of DNA from many
humans and a number of animals. However, all of the X-5s do not
have identical abilities. Max, in particular, is one of two that
have shark DNA. The main effect of this modification is that Max
does not need to sleep, a handy super-power that Nancy Kress
explored in her "Beggars in Spain" trilogy. Most of Max's powers
come from feline DNA, enabling her to leap several times her
height, to always land on her feet, exhibit super-human balance and
agility, and to have the strength of at least several strong men.
Lest you think this is implausible, there was a recent incident in
which a large adult zookeeper was killed by a child-sized chimp.
Apparently he had forgotten that due to differing muscle
attachments, chimps are 4x stronger than humans of the same size
and weight. In addition, Max has cat-like vision, enabling her to
see in the dark, and possibly into the UV/IR range as well.
Additional modifications, possibly from eagles, provide super-human
distance vision. It appears that she has cat-like enhanced
hearing, although this doesn't have a major role in any of the
plots.
Mentally, Max has a phenomenal memory, especially for numbers.
From somewhere she has acquired the ability to listen to a long
string of DTMF pulses and rapidly discern what numbers they
represent. It also is suggested that Max has superior pattern
recognition abilities and spatial processing, probably acquired
from the DNA of humans who possess these skills. All the X-5s are
universal blood donors, something that the military thought might
come in handy on the battlefield. Finally, the X-5s have enhanced
healing abilities that result from their bodies continuously
producing stem cells. This healing ability, although large by
human standards, falls well short of Wolverine levels.
On top of all these genetic enhancements, the X-5s have been
trained from birth in a combination of Spartan and Ninja training,
but using modern weapons. The result is something approximating a
perfect soldier. The X-5s in particular have been trained to be
leaders and officers, something MANTICORE came to regret doing.
All of this enhancement might make things too easy for Max, so she
has been burdened, realistically, I think, with two singular
deficits. Many the X-5s cannot produce a key amino acid, and
unless they can find supplies of this acid in pill form, they are
subject to dangerous seizures. Some of the X-5 also develop a form
of progeria, or premature aging. Finally, Max, due to the large
amount of feline DNA she has, goes into heat two or three times a
year. During this period, much like actual cats, she becomes
sexually insatiable and is driven to mate with any available male.
The "mating season" figures large in two episodes, and is handled
realistically. Her amino acid deficiency seems to wax and wane
according to the demands of the script writers rather than in any
kind of consistent fashion, making this one of the weaker points of
the show.
Overall, DARK ANGEL may be the best TV or movie presentation of
genetically engineered super-soldiers ever done. There are a host
of details that make the background plausible. Among them is
Alba's appearance as a person of mixed Danish/French/Mexican
ethnicity, which allows her to present herself as being the result
of the combination of many races. In fact, this realism may have
hurt the show, since it came along just as significant parts of the
American public became panicked about the possibilities of human
cloning and enhancement.
The 2009 EMP pulse is a very nice touch since it allows the show to
take place in 2019 with much older technology such as might have
survived the pulse. It also seems likely that in the context of
the Pulse, the military might have doubled down on genetic
technology, since it could function in the field under EMP attacks.
We also have to view DARK ANGEL as taking place in an alternate
reality in which America (at least the military) was much more
accepting of biotechnology than has turned out to be the case in
reality. The point of divergence probably lies in the early 90s,
or even earlier.
A major presence in DARK ANGEL is drones used by the corrupt police
and military to control the population. In one episode, these
drones are equipped with guns and an AI that can do facial
recognition to turn them into assassination machines. As I'm sure
you are aware, the US currently operates a world-wide network of
drones, mainly for the purpose of assassination. The only
difference is that we have bigger, faster, and more different kinds
of drones with more different kinds of weapons, but with a human in
the kill loop. A major divergence in the timelines is that while
DARK ANGEL recovered from the Pulse, in the real world the US
military was rapidly developing drones to fight a global "war on
terror." Thus, our real drones of 2013 seem similar to or better
than DARK ANGEL's drones of 2019.
Sticking to traditional super-hero conventions, Max does not use a
gun, and attempts to avoid killing her enemies, although the other
X-5s aren't this squeamish. Many cyberpunk tropes are on view.
Max works as a bicycle messenger, surrounded by a group of quirky
friends, including "Herbal Thought," "Original Cindy," and
"Sketchy." Some of the plots revolve around their encounters with
the law, their low-life friends, or their illegal activities.
Dialog often involves an odd street vernacular. Society is
dominated by corrupt police/military and dirty corporations. There
is little opportunity for the average person, who must often live
on the margins of society. Rather like Catwoman, Max moonlights as
a cat burglar, which brings her into contact with Logan Cale
(Michael Weatherly), a rich playboy who moonlights as "Eyes Only,"
an underground cyber-journalist who seeks to use the spotlight of
publicity and a network of agents to right the many wrongs of post-
Pulse society. Together they become a team, with Max supplying the
muscle and Cale the cyber-skills and equipment while confined to a
wheel chair for much of the season. There are echoes of THE
MENTALIST here, with a brainy male who avoids, for the most part,
physical conflict, and a small but tough female who revels in it.
There are also echoes of the Batman/Catwoman relationship. A
continuing theme is Cale's attempts to walk again, variously via
advanced medical treatments and the usage of a military exo-
skeleton. This exo-skeleton does not seem especially advanced
compared to those we have in the real world of 2013.
An interesting thread that appears in several episodes involves
South Africans who have a force of cybernetically enhanced super-
soldiers who use a kind of over-drive mode that burns out their
bodies but makes them super-strong and insensitive to pain. Their
apparent goal is to acquire MANTICORE genetic technology and thus
improve their flawed force. A consistent theme is that both
cybernetic and genetic enhancements come at a high price.
As DARK ANGEL builds toward an apocalyptic confrontation with
MANTICORE, Max gradually meets many of the other X-5s, and four of
them assemble in the final episode for the assault on MANTICORE.
Generally the other X-5s are treated well, with many interesting
aspects of their existence explored in specific episodes. Some of
the ideas presented, including the development of a strange
religion by some of the X-5s, are realistic but disturbing.
This is about as far as I want to take this review. You can find
plot summaries of the episodes in Wikipedia, or better yet, buy the
DVDs and watch them all. The direction is a bit inconsistent, and
sometimes an episode or two seems mainly copied from somewhere else
(STRAW DOGS, for example). Overall, DARK ANGEL is worth watching,
especially for its many SF elements. OK for older teens and up.
There is quite a bit of martial-arts wire fighting, but not that
much explicit violence. There are a few scenes, of, shall we say,
vigorous foreplay. However, the dark tone and themes of many
episodes may be distressing to some. [-dls]
[DARK ANGEL is available for rent from NetFlix. -mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: E=mc^2 by David Bodanis (book review by Greg Frederick)
The following is a review of the science book titled "E=mc^2" by
David Bodanis. This book takes a deeper look into the development
of this famous equation from Einstein's Special Relativity theory.
The history of science and the individuals involved which lead up
to Einstein's equation are highlighted in this book. Also some of
the ramifications of the effect of this equation are covered too.
E=mc^2 is a mathematical representation of the following; energy
equals mass times the speed of light squared. To fully understand
the formula the book looks at each quantity in this important
equation.
The concept of mass and the idea about the conservation of mass is
discussed first. The idea of the conservation of mass came about
from experiments which Antoine Lavoisier, a Frenchman and his young
wife conducted in the late 1700s. They would put various
substances in a specially built enclosed apparatus. For example, a
piece of metal which was heated to speed up the rusting process
would be put in this box. The sample was weighed before and after
the rusting process; this included the gasses too. They found that
the rusted metal did not weigh less than before the process but
weighed more. Oxygen from the air had combined with the metal to
form the rust or iron oxide. After seeing the similar results with
repeated testing of many other materials they concluded that mass
is not lost in a chemical change; it is conserved and combined into
new forms.
The first time that a good estimate of the speed of light was
produced was in the late 1600s. A Dane by the name of Ole Roemer
discovered that there was a problem with the orbit of Io the
innermost moon of Jupiter. It was supposed to orbit Jupiter every
42.5 hours. But the orbit seemed to vary depending on when you
viewed this moon from the Earth. Roemer thought that this
difference occurred because when you view that moon in the winter
the Earth is much farther away from Jupiter and the Earth is much
closer to Jupiter in the summer. So, since light has a finite
speed that longer distance in the wintertime caused this apparent
difference. His boss, Jean-Dominique Cassini did not believe in
Roemer's conclusions Cassini like most people at that time thought
that light traveled instantaneously and you could not measure its
speed. Eventually, other astronomers agreed with Roemer's results
and his close estimate of the speed of light.
Michael Faraday, an Englishman who worked with Humphry Davy in the
1800s experimented with electricity and magnetism and discovered
that they are different aspects of the same electro-magnetic
energy. Others in the scientific community began to realize that
many forms of energy are connected also. For example, the energy
of the blast of an explosion was the same amount of energy that was
in the gun powder before that explosion.
But it took Einstein and his equation to show that there is a
deeper conservation involved here. That the real conservation of
mass and energy is the connection of energy and mass in E=mc .
Mass can be converted to energy and energy can be converted to
mass. An atomic bomb explosion is an illustration of mass becoming
energy and protons accelerated in a particle accelerator (CERN has
such an accelerator) will gain mass as the energy of their velocity
is increased.
This book has a very good layman's approach to this subject and is
enjoyable to read. [-gf]
==================================================================
TOPIC: LONE SURVIVOR (film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: "The loudest, coldest, darkest, most unpleasant of the
unpleasant fights," the main character says. And that may be the
best description of LONE SURVIVOR, the true story of Operation Red
Wings, a mission to kill an Afghan Taliban leader who had killed
twenty Americans the previous week. The film is a harrowing and
close-to-true account of a Navy Seal mission in which a lot went
wrong and the Seals went through hell. Peter Berg co-produced,
wrote, and directed the film. It would be hard to make the story
any grimmer on film than it is in this account. Rating: +2 (-4 to
+4) or 7/10
Operation Red Wings, the basis for this film, took place on June
28, 2005. The mission failed and about twenty United States
servicemen were killed. A link to the Wikipedia article is below.
The story is a familiar one. Four fighting men (in this case
members of Navy SEAL Team 10) train brutally hard, get involved in
action, and see the situation go from bad to worse until the men
find themselves in a hell on earth. They have to use all their
courage and training to survive as well as they can. In this case
their success rate is given away by the title of the film.
The LONE SURVIVOR follows the small team of Marcus (played by Mark
Wahlberg), Danny (Emile Hirsch), Mike (Taylor Kitsch), and Matt
(Ben Foster) as the focus. The story is told in flashback. So we
know from the beginning that these men are going into a virtual
meat grinder. The film just shows them train, kid around with each
other, and then go into a situation that will be very bloody, and
more than a little frightening. The target is the Taliban leader
Ahmad Shah who the previous week had killed twenty American
soldiers.
When the men are put in danger the fault is as much from their own
defense systems--like their failing communications links--breaking
down as it is from the enemy. Systems failures, bad luck, and
occasional mercies going in both directions do as much to seal the
task force's fate as the force of the Taliban fighters.
Writer/director Peter Berg gives the film the same shocking to
numbing sensibility as THE HURT LOCKER had. It is based on the
actual Operation Red Wings that ended tragically. The film is told
almost entirely in flashback and we know in the beginning how
things will turn out. So that we do not have too much sympathy for
the Taliban leader Shah we see him perform a brutal execution just
off camera. He keeps the dialog realistic, even if it is
occasionally inscrutable with unknown abbreviations and jargon.
The story included situations where the soldiers have to make
difficult ethical decisions, even while fighting. But the focus is
very much on long and harrowing firefight sequences. All told
there is not much in this film that we have not seen in other war
films, though the degree of blood and gore may be more honest and
also more horrifying than we are used to. The cinematography is by
Tobias A. Schliessler who is able to give us some natural vistas of
great beauty that is a welcome contrast to the ugliness of the
battle.
The film does not seem to make a statement that the US should not
be involved in Afghanistan, though it could be interpreted that
way. I think all Peter Berg is really saying is that we are lucky
to have men willing to take on the missions of Navy SEALS. We
should respect and appreciate them, a message that toes back at
least as far as John Wayne World War II movies. Here the message
is just delivered more realistically and more brutally. I would
rate this LONE SURVIVOR a +2 on the -4 to +4 scale or 7/10.
Film Credits: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1091191/combined
What others are saying:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lone_survivor/
Wikipedia on Operation Red Wings:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Red_Wings
[-mrl]
==================================================================
TOPIC: This Week's Reading (book comments by Evelyn C. Leeper)
We chose THE EERIE SILENCE: RENEWING OUR SEARCH FOR ALIEN
INTELLIGENCE by Paul Davies (ISBN 978-0-547-42258-9) for our
December book discussion book, and it did a reasonably interesting
job of examining the Fermi Paradox. (Briefly put, the Fermi
Paradox is, "If there are all those extra-terrestrial intelligences
out there that we think there are, how come we haven't seen any
evidence of them?")
Davies did make a minor literary error: Wells did not have his time
machine go backwards to before it was built (though he did imply it
could). On the other hand, I found it interesting to realize that
cable television is ruining our chances for discovering other
civilizations, because while we were broadcasting television
signals into space for fifty years, that is pretty much coming to
an end.
A couple of other books I recently read ended up connected to it as
well.
In THE NEW AMBIDEXTROUS UNIVERSE: SYMMETRY AND ASYMMETRY FROM
MIRROR REFLECTIONS TO SUPERSTRINGS (REVISED [3RD] EDITION) by
Martin Gardner (ISBN 978-0-7167-2093-0), Gardner spends an entire
chapter discussing the origin of life, including how likely or
unlikely it was, and hence how likely or unlikely it is elsewhere
in the universe. This is one of the factors in Drake's equation,
which attempts to quantify how likely extra-terrestrial
intelligences that we could communicate with are.
Gardner, amazingly, also makes mistakes, or at least has sloppy
writing. In the second paragraph of chapter 3, Gardner says,
"[T]here is a curious class of solid objects that are superposable
on their mirror images, and therefore symmetric, yet lack a plane
of symmetry." Two paragraphs later, he writes, "To be symmetric a
solid object must have at least one plane of symmetry."
And the sentence he claims is not reversed on page 25 does however
become different, because it extends over two lines, so flipping
the book around and viewing it in the mirror puts the last word at
the beginning of the sentence. (That may just be sloppy
typesetting.)
And clever as it is, one must recognize that Frederic Brown's "The
End" is not truly palindromic (at least not in the sense of being a
perfectly normal story when read straight through). Far better
literary palindromes have been written since This 1990 edition, for
example "Lost Generation" by Jonathan Reed, "Lost" by Heather
Stephens, and "The Future of Publishing" (Khaki Films).
While in THE EERIE SILENCE Davies attempts to put bounds on the
various terms in Drake's equation, in IF THE UNIVERSE IS TEEMING
WITH ALIENS... WHERE IS EVERYBODY? FIFTY SOLUTIONS TO THE FERMI
PARADOX AND THE PROBLEM OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE Stephen Webb
(ISBN 978-0-387-95501-8) looks at the fifty most
popular/likely/frequently given answers to the paradox. For
example, number 16 is "they are signaling but we do not know how to
listen," number 23 is "they have no desire to communicate," and
number 39 is "the galaxy is a dangerous place."
Davies discusses each one, and usually ends up dismissing it. For
example, "they have no desire to communicate" is only the answer if
*all* the extraterrestrial races have the same psychology and
*none* desires to communicate.
However, Webb's solution takes all this into account, but
[spoiler!] comes up with the depressing result that there are no
other intelligences out there. And he does this with the Sieve of
Eratosthenes! (Well, it's really just an elaboration of Drake's
equation.) Basically, he starts with 10^12 planets in the galaxy.
In one solution he discusses a "galactic habitable zone"; assume
only 20% of the stars are in this zone. We're down to 2x10^10
planets. Then look at just the stars like our sun; this drops the
number again. Pare it down more by taking into account cosmic
disasters, no life developing, no intelligence developing, no
technology developing, no language developing, etc., and Webb
thinks we are down to about one: Earth.
Even if you do not agree with his conclusion, however, his
enumeration and discussion of so many of the possible answers is
well worth reading. (He also quotes a lot of science fiction
authors.) [-ecl]
==================================================================
Mark Leeper
mleeper@optonline.net
Even the tiniest Poodle or Chihuahua is still
a wolf at heart.
--Dorothy Hinshaw Patent